This website is a member of Liberty Alliance, which has been named as an company.

Democrats and Romney – They Want Romney to be our Candidate!

Written on Wednesday, January 25, 2012 by


Have you ever wondered why Obama and his thugs are spending money on so many negative advertisements ONLY for Romney? It is because they WANT the Republicans to choose Romney as our Presidential Candidate. They are trying to make us believe they “do not want Romney as our Presidential Candidate.” Their strategy is if Obama (or Hillary Clinton) is the Democratic Nominee, they can win over Mitt Romney. So they are doing everything they can to pretend to be ‘scared’ if we were to nominate Romney to be our Republican candidate.

If they say they fear Romney the most, who really believes the Democrats are telling the truth anyway? They are using “reverse psychology” and this is why the Democratic Party is airing so many negative ads. They want us to elect Romney. The Democrats want us to believe that if Romney is our Candidate, that we have a chance to beat Obama. In fact, it is just the opposite. If we nominate Romney, we are doing just as much damage to our US Constitution as Obama did by running and winning. This is explained in detail later in this article.

Another trick the Democrats will use is the “take away” where they realize we see through their reverse psychology mind trick and will move on to implement step two. In this scenario they create a message where they take away something and that “take away” is supposed to make us want ‘Romney’ more. The example is like a sales person telling you “no, you really cannot afford to buy something” and this makes you want it all the more. This is called the “take [it] away” because they make you feel you cannot have it, which makes you want to get it no matter what. In this case, their message will be about trying to take something away which is to drive us into the hands of Romney. Be watchful and wary.

The real question is “why do we really want to elect Romney anyway?” His dad was born in Mexico so what is the difference between Mexico and Kenya? Oh, Mexico is in “The America’s” and Kenya is in “Africa.” If we put our support behind Romney, we are endorsing Obama because neither of them is a “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!”

If Romney was a true Republican, I mean, if Romney was really a TRUE AMERICAN rooted deeply as a Republican, he would remove himself as the Republican seeking to become the President of the United States. Romney said in the South Carolina debate his Dad was from Mexico (and Chicago) so he KNOWS he is not a Natural Born Citizen. The BEST thing Romney could do is to continue to vet out Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and Ron Paul so we can beat whoever is going to be the Democratic Candidate. We really MUST nominate a REAL Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America for our Republican Presidential Candidate! The reason why this is important and is very serious to us as a Nation is because this is written specifically in our US Constitution.

Another example of how we know the Democrats hate our US Constitution is proven by them telling the main stream media to get us to elect other people who are also not Natural Born Citizens. Are we not bombarded with the media talking about Marco Rubio and Donald Trump running for office of the President of the United States too? I am telling you, neither of these people is a Natural Born Citizen and is NOT qualified to hold that position. There are many other Federal Government positions they can hold, it is just not the President of the United States they cannot hold. The ultimate goal of Democratic Party to distort, pervert and destroy our US Constitution. In addition, they want to justify what they have done with Barack Obama by making us elect a Republican candidate who is ALSO not a Natural Born Citizen!

There are many more reasons for us to not nominate Romney, but since he really cannot hold the Office of President of the US anyway, then why bother going into these details? If we choose Romney, we are validating Obama and this is VERY BAD for our US Constitution. If we believe in preserving our US Constitution, then Romney should not run for this position and we should not nominate him. Since he is continuing to run for the Presidential position, it is clear he is really NOT a Conservative Republican, so why elect him to represent us anyway?

Wake Up America! We are under attack by the left and need to see what they are trying to do to us!

Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

  • evolved

    Nope, Daniel, the left wants Newt because he’s easier to beat. I don’t know a single liberal or Democrat (they aren’t the same thing, despite what you might read in The Patriot Update) who would rather face Mitt. Reverse psychology? You’re a riot.

    You keep working that “Natural Born Citizen” malarkey, Daniel. Obama and Mitt were born in the U.S., so they both meet the Constitutional requirement to be POTUS, despite your desperate desire to circumvent the inevitable: Obama wins again.

    • Mad Mike

      Evolved. Read the US Constitution. It requires that, in order to run for president, BOTH parents must be natural-born americans. (born in this country). Both Obama and Romney are not qualified to run for this office. All of our laws are being ignored by both parties. Revolution time is nigh!

    • daves

      Mike – I will give you $100 if you can show me where in the Constitution it says both parents.

    • Dingbat36

      The SCOTUS of 1875 ruled on this issue and “defined” the phrase natural born (from the Constitution)as a person born to two American citizens………….You can read the opinion in Minor vs Happersett. Look it up yourself, I did.

    • daves

      Minor vs Happersett ruled that a person born of two citizens outside the United States is a natural born citizen. It did not rule on people born in the United States born of only one citizen parent.

    • Andee

      1875 SCOTUS decision, Minor vs Happerstett or however you spell that name…that is where!!!! They are the law of the land; besides why would we want NEWT or MTT..CFR member, high rollers, big spenders and big government advocates.

    • Johnnygard

      As much as I like Newt and DO NOT WANT ROMNEY, I have to agree with daves. Do they just let anyone write articles for this site? Like a stopped clock, daves is correct twice out of 1440 times.

    • daves

      I challenge you to prove that anything I say is false. I know you don’t like what I say but I try very hard to be truthful.

    • 2WarAbnVet

      Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875)
      “the original common law definition of an Article II ‘natural born Citizen’ . . . is a child born in the country to a United States citizen mother and father’ . . . .

      Where’s my $100?

    • Johnnygard

      You adlibbed a little there. What you typed is not the way it is in the decision, and the decision acknowledged that they knew the lady was a natural born citized because they knew her parents were U.S. citizens. They didn’t say that two U.S. citizen parents was the ONLY way to be a natural born citizen.

    • Johnnygard

      “citized” should be “citizen” also.

    • daves

      And you are not quoting the Constitution.

    • Johnnygard

      daves, You seem to have more of a problem when I agree with you than when we disagree. We were refering to Minor v. Happersett.

    • daves

      Johnny – I was just explaining that my original offer was for a text from the Constitution. 2WarAbnVet seems to think Minor vs Happersett qualifies.

    • AZ Don

      The constitution does not explain Natural Born Citizen. However, the supreme court in 1875 did make that determination.

    • Donald DeHoff

      “daves”. You are right the constitution does not say “both”, but later Supreme Court case law uses the word “parents”–plural. and they go on to say the reason is they want to reduce the possibility that a candidate will have any allegience to a foreign country or to parents who might have such foreign allegiences. Donate “my” hundred dollars to a worthy cause.

    • daves

      How can we be sure that this author is not secretly working for the Democrats in order to get the nomination for Newt?

    • evolved

      Mad Mike, YOU read the Constitution; there is no such provision in there. Produce it, and I’ll shut up. And, if you’re going to revolt, learn truth vs. fiction first.

    • Co-opted Confederate

      Too Bad the thumbs up or down is crashed or you’d be in the red, deep red!

    • Randy131

      It’s been quite apparent that Obama and the Democrats really want Romney to be the Republican nominee, for they worry that Newt will do to Obama what Reagan did to Jimmy Carter, for they know that people compare Obama and Carter as being two peas from the same pod.

    • della

      The writer of this article is correct. From the beginning, the media chose Romney to win. Then Nancy Pelosi chose Romney. The Democrats want Romney to be the chosen candidate. If that does not ring bells of alarm, it should. Anyone chosen by either or both of these groups can not be the right choice for us. I still think Gingrich is the only one who can stand a chance of defeating Obama.

    • frustrated American

      Actually Romney was born in the US, the only question there is whether his father was a citizen at the time of his birth. Obama was born in Kenya. That’s why all this folderol witht he fake birth certificates and stealing a SSN from a dead man in HA.Obama’s father was never a citizen and neither was his step-father. He renounced what US citizenship he did have by applying for student aid under a foreign Visa.Which is why they are refusing to release his college transcripts. Eventually he will come up with some faked up ones to release just like he did the birth certificate. I’d say Reid and Pelosi will help him get a better forger this time. Since they have tied their carts to his.

    • Nate

      N.B.C. does not equal “born on U.S. soil.” It means offspring of two citizen parents, be they themselves N.B.C.s or naturalized citizens. If Romney’s Mexican-borne father was naturalized before Mitt was borne, then Mitt is a N.B.C. too. The offspring of two horses will, according to natural law, be a horse. Likewise, the offspring of two citizens would, according to natural law, be a citizen. Hence the term natural borne citizen. The framers of the Constitution didn’t put that word in there by mistake.

    • http://FACEBOOK mary dean

      this is just about the truest down-right article i have read about anything to do with the election = anybody who trusts the democrats is nuts they are the biggest bullys, crooks, liars, – i could go on but why? we must get them out of washington~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    I’ve known this for some time now. I can see right through Romney just like I did Obama. Romney is nothing but an elitist that will cave to the likes of Soros and the democrats know it! Click on my name to visit Right Wing America! 100% Free, 100% Uncensored. No PC police! Join today! Go Newt 2012!

    • Andee


      Why would you want another big time roller, big government in the W House…a member of the CFR group, supported the mandate in Obamacare, Tarp and much, much more.

      Let us take a look at Romney for a minute..we all know of the NDAA…”I would have voted for it.” That says it all does it not?

  • Dingbat36

    The Republican establishment..the moderate big boys at the top are doing the same thing they did before the 2008 election, pushing an insipid moderate at us.

    How hard did you have to pinch your nose to vote for McCain? It darn near made me gag, but I did it. DO NOT lose sight of the prize here. The ultimate goal is to GET RID OF the imposter in the White House.

    • Andee

      Which candidate has never voted against the Constitution; which candidate supports the Constitution all the way; which candidate wants the TSA and Patriot Act gone? This means our freedoms are back people; which candidate will support getting out of the UN? This means more freedoms back people and it also means the AGENDA is gone, that is right gone! Which candidate supports a smaller, more efficient government? Which candidates wants to trim the wings of the vicious EPA? Which candidate would support revamping or rescinding Homeland and get rid of the mad person at its head…I swear she lays away at night dreaming of ways to hurt we Americans further. Let freedom ring loud and clear and then let us get to work on the rest of the problems..the UN goes, heah, that is heap of good news in itself. Obama cannot run … found ineligible, then all he has done and signed is over with and we can then begin to bring him to court for the transgressions against the USA..surely we don’t want to put an Obummer in there that is in white skin…do we ?

  • V. Tomas

    King of Bain
    This video is 28 minutes long. It authenticates the claims that Mitt Romney made his fortune as a major corporate raider. One who’s stolen the jobs of thousands of American workers, while amassing a net worth estimated at 1/4 a billion dollars I recommend taking the time to watch some, or better yet all, of it.
    Capitalism made America great – free markets, innovation, hard work – the building blocks of the American Dream. But in the wrong hands some of those dreams can turn into nightmares. This film is about one raider and his firm and how they destroyed that dream for thousands of Americans and their families – Mitt Romney and Bain Capital.
    Think you know Mitt? YOU OWE IT TO AMERICA TO WATCH THIS! It’s not about Capitalism, it’s about JOBS

  • Kaye

    When Romney was leading before the South Carolina debate a prominent Democrat lady was excited about Romney being ‘our’ candidate. She stated the Democrats wanted Romney to win because it would be so easy for Obama to beat him. And there were 4 Supreme Court cases taking up the notion of natural born citizen in the 1800’s (Sorry, I do not know the names of the cases.), but it was understood at the time the Constitution was signed that Natural Born was from two American parents. Also eligible to be president were people who were citizens at the time of the signing of the Declaration of Independence were eligible to be president.

    • Martin Ridens

      That lady was Donna Brazille. She let it slip after one of the debates in her smug little way that they want Romney because they know they can beat him. She is the vice-chair at the DNC for getting out the vote so she should know. It isn’t as complicated as the author of this story makes it out though. They want Romney because they’ve prepared for Romney and they are lazy. It really is that simple.

      They’ll have no problem coming up with a campaign to smear Newt and beat him too, it’s just that it will take more work.

  • aspergus hermann

    Romney is an obama, in a republican suit
    No diffeance he will say or do any thng
    to get elected –and then like the other
    he will fill his bank account-and sell the US dowwn the river–

  • Justwhistlingdixie

    WRONG, the democrat/communists want Gingrich to be the nominee of the republican party.
    WHY is that? Simple , The democrat/communists can destroy Gingrich and his candidacy anytime they wish, and it could be done by just using facts that are already avaliable and in the public domain. But, as usual, the republican voters do not spend anytime doing their research or thinking on their own, so the truth will only become a major news event when the communist decides to make it happen.

    • Bruno Boccagalupe

      Sayb there Justwhistling, you say tyhe repubs don’t know what is going on. How about you in your infinite wisdom educate us all on what exactly IS going on in this primary run? I’m sure everyone would appreciate hearing from such a learned fellow such as yourself.

    • Johnnygard

      Bruno, I’ll give odds that you don’t get an intelligent response from him.

    • Johnnygard

      Bruno, It’s hours later and you still didn’t get a response, let alone an intelligent response. But I did get a thumbs down for being right.

    • Martin Ridens

      I’ll take a stab at it. The inevitable nominee ploy wasn’t working at all. So now the statists in the Republican party are giving the voters the choice between two statists. We have the safe, popular, establishment statist and now the angry, rebel, usurpur statist. Doesn’t everyone feel better now that we have a REAL choice in this election?

      Then in November America can have the choice between the social statist and the corporate statist. Either way, what we will get is more government, less freedom, and less liberty.

      At all costs, what all these statists want is the shut up and marginalize the one non-statist in this race.

    • Andee

      Neither is a good candidate for this most important of elections..they both are fraudulent personalities and will shovel our bodies right into the mire of the mud that they sling and create after they get in. When you are dealing with someone that plays with the big boys, like the CFR. that is dangerous ground and when you wimp out and believe that someone that ruined their own state..bankrupted it remember, and still supports Obamacare….well, you are in the place known as hell for that is what will come with Mitt…………..

    • Johnnygard

      There are lots of people in the CFR from all walks of life and both parties. Charles Krauthammer, Rush Limbaugh, Condi Rice, Fred Thompson, many people from Reagan’s administration, along with Wm F Buckley Jr and Tony Snow are/were members. So I guess the world is doomed – we don’t have a chance? WAIT,I know, SUPER RON TO THE RESCUE!?

    • Martin Ridens

      Or, we could just go with the bigger and bigger government thing until one day our great grandchildren find themselves in chains with no freedom and no liberty. I’m sure they’ll thank us for their safety.

    • frustrated American

      Why don’t you check your facts instead of swallowing the pap spewed by Romney, the GOP establishment and the Democrats? They have all been trying to push Romney down our throats since day one. He is no better than what we have now and will keep the status quo. The only hope we have is either Newt or Ron Paul. Santorim talks like a religious right wing nut but he actually votes liberal. Ron Paul actually has the most consistant voting record as a conservative constitutionalist but he is ineffective. Newt has compromised over the years on some things in order to get others done in the best interest of our country.But he is definitely not ineffective. He’s a fighter and we need that now.

    • Donald DeHoff

      Lots of talk and lots of complaining. How about educating us on the facts that are out in the “public domain”? Don’t make such strong comments without backing them up with authoritative documentation. I am willing to listen.

  • tod

    barrycare,romneycare,muslim,mormon,barry’s father wasn’t born in the US,romney father wasn’t born in the US,NO DIFFERENCE !!! Dr.Ron Paul 2012 for the ONLY PROVEN HONEST(for Well Over 30 Years)God Fearing Patriot running for President,PERIOD !!!

    • Bruno Boccagalupe

      Tod as I understand it, the elder Romney was born in Mexico to US born citizens. SCOTUS has ruled that a child born to two US citizens in a foreign country, has US citizenship. Therefore Romneys father was a citizen and Romney, the candidate is a natural born citizen. Correct me if I’m wrong.

    • ticktockoma

      Bronco you are quite right Romney is a natural born citizen.

    • Johnnygard

      Bruno, I’m 90% sure that Mitt was born in the United States. It was his father that was born in Mexico, to two U.S. citizens, so his father was ruled a Natural Born Citizen in order to run for Governor of Michigan (a requirement in Mich.).

    • Donald DeHoff

      Bruno, OK, you are wrong. I suggest you take several of the comments opposing your viewpoint, go to Google and the other search engines and find out for yourself as to what the issues and facts are. I think you will be suprised.

  • Kaye

    The reference to natural born citizen was taken from an English-language translation of Emerich de Vattel’s 1758 treatise The Law of Nations (original French title: Le Droit du gens), stating that “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country of parents who are citizens,” was quoted in 1857 by Supreme Court justice Peter Vivian Daniel in a concurring opinion in Dred Scott v. Sandford,[17] as well as by Chief Justice Melville Fuller in 1898 in his dissenting opinion in United States v. Wong Kim Ark.[18]

  • Doodlebug

    Well, for starters, let’s not allow the dummicrats choose our candidate! Let’s give some thought to what is happening here.

    • tod

      In that case Doodlebug you better vote for Dr.Ron Paul because the Demon-rats are pushing anybody but Paul !!!

    • Andee

      The RNC will not seat Ron, why? He scares them..he would bring this nation back and the RNC, like the DNC wants to see it gone; look at the House that we elected to clean things up..Boehner has done nothing and that includes non support to rid ourselves of the commie Holder! We can try to work this to the masses and write him in..that will be his best chance short of our Lord, which he does believe in, putting him in…I am praying for that and hope you all will put his name out there and pray…he is a good guy..I wonder why people try to hold him to a higher standard than the three butts that running also..Santorum..big government , big spender..never turned away from a bill to increase spending and borrowing that came across his desk; Newt, CFR and Bilderberg relationships and memberships; Romney, an Obummer in a white skin….

    • Donald DeHoff

      Tod, you are persisent. You and your group aways chip in with a Dr. Paul pitch, but you all fail to list specifics as to why you support him. I believe both me and the other commenters have successfully refuted every pitch you all have made. First you do not understand what libertarians are up to. True, Dr. Paul has many good ideas, but keep in mind there has never been a libertarian government. Many countries have libertarian parties but most of those countries quickly evolved into socialist, fascist or communist goverments of which many further evolved into dictatorships. Europe is awash in them. Also, I have observed Dr. Paul in his debates and I admire his intestional fortitude, but he just does not have either the mental or phycical stamina to surive in a 24/7 oval office setting–after those debates, he appears exhausted and is almost in a stupor. If he ran on a libertarian ticket, he would, by now, be long gone.

  • Sandy/LA,CA

    I’m voting for Newt because of what Nancy said. If they wanted Newt to debate Obama, they would not have said anything to turn people away from him before the nomination. I saw through the spin! In reality, they are afraid of Obama having to debate Newt. He will CREAM Barack! Not that I like Gingrich, but I’m thinking on the terms of beating Obama right now. In 4 years, if he isn’t what we want, we can then vote him out!

    • JayWW

      Should Newt be nominated, he’ll have about two hours at the most to debate Obama. It will be a tie on points. There will be thousands of hours of TV ads turning Newt inside out. What do you think the sheep are going to remember?

    • Jerry F.

      Wrong Jay the 2 parties have already agreed to 3 debates,the dems. agreed because when they did it,it looked like Romney was a shoe in.They have good idea Romney is a weak candidate,their right.

    • Johnnygard

      Even better is Newts plan if Obummer refuses to debate. If you don’t know Newts plan, then you know very little about him.

    • Andee

      Newt will ruin this nation. Study the CFR of which he is and has been a member of for a spell…he is with the Bilderbergs…in essence, they and people as Soros are taking our nation down..why would we want to continue this free fall into the pits of hell?

    • Johnnygard

      Newt has told us what his connection to CFR was. Do you have evidence that he lied? He met with the CFR, along with others, to discuss ways to combat global terrorism. Newt is not afraid to talk to ANYONE about ANYTHING, but when he talks to anyone that’s not a conservative, he gets slandered for it.

    • Martin Ridens

      Newton L. Gingrich is about a third of the way down the page on this current membership list for the letter G.

    • Johnnygard

      He is there along with other big time liberals that want to destroy America like Charles Krauthammer, Rush Limbaugh, Condi Rice, Fred Thompson and many people from the Reagan Administration. Also, Wm F. Buckley Jr and Tony Snow were members. So besides Ron Paul is there someone else we can trust? If not, how will Ron get ANYTHING done as president when he could’t get anything done in 23 years as a representative? (The top half of this is “tongue-in-cheek”, in case some couldn’t tell.)

  • celine

    Mitt was born in Detroit, that’s what i read, Obama was not born here, You do not need both Parents to be born here to run for president, i was not born here but i know this much,

    • Andee


      You are very wrong; there is a difference in NATURAL born and naturalized..obummer may be neither as he has not turned in the Indonesian passport making him a dual citizen and he is as illegal as can be to serve. Check the SCOTUS rulings back to the Founders……….

    • Johnnygard

      Born in the U.S., and “subject to the jurisdiction thereof”, makes you a “natural born citizen”, versus a “naturalized citizen”. The first happens at birth, the latter has to be applied for and granted later.

  • V. Tomas

    This is an audio of an interview by a woman who grew up in the Mormon church with a dad who was a Bishop. (She has since left the church) She explains the real intent behind Romney “needing” to become president. It’s worth listening to. It starts with music and an intro so be patient. These were things we were told when we lived in AZ back in the 80’s and she confirms them.

    • Andee

      This video, second part, is downright sickening…ACLU, former representative of, works witht he LGTB movement, believes, evidently, that abortion is ok. and we can continue to pay for it…no wonder she is not longer a Mormon..perhaps they believe as we do..Thou shalt not kill and that means the baby that God knew before we were to know! This woman is sick..I would not get within ten feet of someone that believes as this woman does if I could help it…

  • Lynn

    Romneys record stinks, thats why he runs so many ads with proven lies. He can not run on his record. First for gay marriage,socialist health care,anti gun laws,$700mill. taxes,$50.00 abortions..Theres a reason why Mitt destroyed all records from when he was govenor. Dems are cheering for Mitt.

  • Damon

    Well-Just as I predicted when everyone was up in arms about Romney’s victorious win in Iowa and New Hampshire was trumped when he started moving South and Gingrich picked up steam. I agree with this writer that Romney is a flip flop and will not be the conservative we are looking for. Newt knows the ropes and although he made mistakes look how the News Media is portraying him. Newt his rolling across Dixie now and Super Tuesday is almost here. Bet Newt picks up steam to roll across the cotton fields.–but he won’t be whistling Dixie.

  • SM

    If you people who have posted here today would look further than what someone else said you wouldn’t be so far out in left field about Romney. His grandfather moved to Mexico where his father was born. The big difference here is that even though they lived in Mexico both grandfather and grandmother were still US citizens which made Romney’s father a natural-born citizen just the same way McCain is a citizen and as upheld by a vote of the Congress for the 2008 elections.

    If you think otherwise, then you must also believe that all of the children born to military families based in other countries at the time of their birth are not citizens. Which way do you want it. There are a lot of military people, present and past, who will get in your face if you believe otherwise.

    And just for the record, I will not vote for Romney if he is the GOP candidate. I will vote for whatever third party candidate is running. I would rather do that than endorse a liberal/socialist like Romney and who is as arrogant and narcissistic as obama.

    If Romney is elected as President there would be no difference than having obama for another four years so what difference would it make anyway, voting for a third party and getting obama for another four or getting Romney for four.

    • Johnnygard

      I was with you until you got to the part about voting third party. Don’t people like you realize that if Obummer gets reelected, it will be taken as a mandate to completely destroy the country that we remember from a few years back. At least electing a Republican shows the other Democrats that they need to compromise with the Republicans or risk losing reelection.

    • frustrated American

      Being former military, I can tell you there is a big difference. Military posts are considered American soil. So children born to military parents are born on American soil. This is totally different than three people who flee the US to a foreign country to avoid being prosecuted. If his father and mother were both citizens at the time of his birth, then Romney is a natural born citizen. I, however, would rather vote for the pig in my hog lot. He is no different from what we have now. The Libtard-Democrats and GOP establishment would love to see Romney get the nomination cause it would be a win-win election for them.

  • Wasup

    Newt Gingrich is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Their goal is a one world government. You do not believe it? Goggle it and find out for yourself.

  • Hubcap

    Romney is another phony. He is as dumb as the guy who writes the speeches for Barry O.

    We will have to take a chance with a catholic and not with a Mormon. Although, we really ought to let Santorum who is young and poor have his turn to screw things up.

    • frustrated American

      Get real. Check Santorim’s voting record. He is as liberal as the Libtard-Democrats. His right wing-nut attitude is all fake. And he is no longer poor. He has amassed wealth since being elected, just like all the rest of the leeches and vultures in our government. What a joke!

  • Lugnut

    Hog Wash. Do you stay up at night making this trash up or are you all this misinformed?

  • Blair Colquhoun

    The problem is that Obama doesn’t believe in
    free enterprise.

  • Lugnut

    You all sound like the STOU speech by Obama, “I’ve hear this song a thousand times and its still being sung off key.

  • eyzewydeopened

    Please do your own research people. Romneys’grandparents were us citizens. They went to Mexico for a time, with us citizenship intact.His dad was born in Mexico, they came back to the US. Mitt IS a nautural born citizen. Obama is not since his biological father was a subject of the the UK. Mom was too young. When Sotero adopted him, he became a citizen of Indonesia, and gave up any US citizenship legal or not.
    Let’s not take our eye off the prize, people. We must replace Obama with someone who is the most conservative, to lead this country back to the constitution and greatness.
    That said, I do think the dems think Obama could beat Romney. I think Obama himself plays it all cool, but I bet he dreads debating Newt. Romney not so much. Ron Paul would look like a Crazy, cranky old man. Rick Santorum, might just have what it takes. I do not think Romney has the fire in his belly that is needed, he just has this placid demeanor. Newt and Santorum do have the fire. I just wish Romney would show it.

    • Kay

      What kind of fire do you want Romney to show? Rudeness like Gingrich?

  • patriot

    why would you vote for someone that the so called republican elite are backing,these people lie about every thing and now you are gonna trust them and vote for romney cause they say so,he is a phony,vote for NEWT,i know he is not perfect but he is not a communist and that is why people like nancy pelosi are going after him cause they know he will expose them for what they are and he is the only one who has the gump to do this and it scares the dems and republicans that he might win and end their big party that they been having at the tax payers expense for the last 15 years.he is the only one that will put a stop to the nonsense going on in washington d.c.

  • 2WarAbnVet

    The liberal/socialist media and the Republican establishment are working assiduously to select Romney as the Republican candidate. Romney is basically “McCain 2012″, a weak uninspiring nominee. McCain was the media darling until he was chosen to be the Republican candidate. Then he was slimed in every possible way. Surely you recall the sexual harassment and the “not native born” charges. If they succeed in making that “weak-sister”, Romney, the candidate, they’ll start working on him.

  • Jay

    Sure they do, because he is guaranteed to be aq loser.

  • Michael O’Flaherty

    the Demorats want Romney as the Republican candidate because Romney is Obummer-lite and could not be shown as anything but lesser than but of the same philosophies as Obummer.
    Against Obummer-lite, Obummer couldn’t lose. we would continue our downfall into socialism and then communism. Today’s Roman Empire reenacted.
    Michael O’

  • Earle Belle

    Mitt Romney Keeps Defending the Individual Mandate:

    The Romney Con Exposed:

    Rush Limbaugh: Romney Is Not Mr. Conservative!

    Why Did A Former Romney Campaigner Defect to Another Candidate?

    Study: On Spending Cuts, Most GOP Candidates Light On Details; Who Isn’t?:

    Another great place for information on the candidates is The Conservative Scorecard, which is an easy-to-read description on the strength of the candidates on key conservative positions. The ratings are based on their prior statements and positions over their political careers. It can be found here:

    Newt Gingrich: Serial Hypocrisy?

    Gingrich would be worse than Obama on Foreign Policy:

    Gingrich Supported Goldwater? Newt Helped Reagan End the Cold War? Said Newt Gingrich in the Tampa Debate: “I went to a Goldwater organizing session in 1964. I met with Ronald Reagan for the first time in 1974. I worked with Jack Kemp, and Art Laffer and others to develop supply side economics in the late ’70s. I helped Governor Reagan become President Reagan. I helped pass the Reagan economic program and worked with the National Security Council on issues including the collapse of the Soviet Empire…” Said Gingrich before: On Reagan’s decision to meet with Mikhail Gorbachev, Salon’s Glenn Greenwald notes: “Newt Gingrich… denounced President Reagan’s rapprochement with Gorbachev in 1985 as potentially “the most dangerous summit for the West since Adolf Hitler met with Chamberlain in 1938 at Munich.”

    Shockingly Massive Evidence That Newt Gingrich is Far From Being A Conservative!

    Gingrich Condemned How Reagan Ended the Cold War: Newt says he helped Reagan defeat the Soviet Union. Was that before or after he said this? Reports BBC: In 1985… Mr Gingrich referred to a meeting between Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev as “the most dangerous summit for the West since Adolf Hitler met with Chamberlain in 1938 at Munich”.

  • Martin Ridens

    Why waste all this time and energy on “natural born citizen”? Yes, I know it is in the Constitution and it matters but it isn’t going anywhere. It is a distraction, smoke and mirrors. Both sides of the political aisle play rough and loose with our Constitution. We have a number of foreign banks in control of our money supply. We have our Congress passing laws that say American citizens can be indefinitely detained without trial, a lawyer, or even a phone call. We have American citizens being killed with no trial. We have authoritarian thugs groping us in our airports. We have local authoritarians getting increasingly bolder as they follow the example of their counterparts in DC. And most people seem to think just electing any old guy with an R behind his name will make a difference. It’s time to wake up and stop wasting time on trivialities.

  • m. sharpe

    President Obama served a good deed by allowing the Progressives to feel comfortable enough to come “out”. Gov.Romney is a Progressive and He his requiring even more people to come out.Hell 3/4 of Fox talking heads are coming out.Some of whom I am losing respect for voted Obama last time.The shadow govt. has America on the edge of a Dictatorship;We must stop them from picking the winners and losers now.Dont count on Obama even being on the ticket in Nov. and He is not the standard,or Hillary.Let Us all cut the puppet strings.

  • Ultor

    After this week’s melt down and “coming out” of formerly considered conservative author Ann Coulter, I went back to review some of the titles of her books. Post the revelations this week that her first choice for a GOP presidential nominee, Chris Christie, Governor of New Jersey’s appointment of an openly gay judge as though what this judge does with his genitalia is somehow a qualification on judicial appointments and Coulters second choice, Willard Mitt Romney whom also appointed left-wing pro abortion judges as if killing the unborn is to be the new GOP banner, I thought to revise a few of the titles that made her famous.
    “Godless: How I Infiltrated Conservatism for Two Decades”
    “Guilty: How I Became a Liberal Victim in America”
    “How to Talk to Ann Coulter (If You Must): When the Conservatives Woke-up”
    “If Republicans Had Any Brains, They’d know I’m a RINO”
    “Demonic: How this Liberal Endangered America”
    “High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Because Bill Clinton Refused to Stain My Teeth or Share His Cigar With Me”
    “Slander: How Supporting Chris Christie and Willard M. Romney Finally Got Me Busted”
    And, Ann will probably continue her efforts as a mediocre scrivener. We can expect her new shtick to sound a bit more like, “How Andrew Stein Preserved My Cover in 2008: And Kept Me off the Public Dole,” and the sure to be best sellers, “Ann Coulter: Agent #2,” and “Coulter And The Cultist: Mitt N Me in 2012.”

  • bob corbe

    Obummer learned his politcs from Romney
    Romney care and then Obummer care, Romney belives in closing businesses, Obummer closes businesses. Romney has nothing that
    Obummer hasn’t tried.