Enough already, it’s time for revolt. Structural racism, white male privilege, whatever a person “officially” calls it, is a means to the same end. It is “racism” based purely on skin color and nothing else. Shamelessly, it is accusing white men of being “institutionally” racist with no proof or evidence of that being true. Unless the white man in question has sworn allegiance to the liberal, progressive agenda and then begged and pleaded for forgiveness for being born white, then he is semi-vindicated. But even still, whiteness begets racism, especially when mixed with the hate tonic of Christianity.
Some fine young men at Minneapolis Community and Technical College decided they were sick of listening to the theory of structural racism. As reported by the toxic progressive outlet Salon on Monday, December 2nd, three white male students revolted against their professor’s ranting about structural racism. Naturally, Salon got the only side of the story that interested them, the side that propagated institutional racism. That would be black female professor Shannon Gibney’s take on the ordeal. She said the students “reacted in a hostile manner to the lesson in her Introduction to Mass Communication class, with one of them asking her, “Why do we have to talk about this in every class? Why do we have to talk about this?”
This is hardly a hostile question. It’s actually quite simple. Why do students have to talk about this every day, to be subjected to the idea that women and minorities are repressed because of white men? That every problem on the planet is the result of white males, and that whites by virtue of skin color have every advantage. Nothing bad happens to them. White males rule the world, and everyone else is just fishing for what’s left. What utter nonsense. Where’s the accountability?
The incident enraged Ms. Gibney and Salon. If the writers at Salon are unhappy all the better. There is plenty of fake outrage to go around. Gibney implied that the students got aggressive toward her. When speaking specifically about one student, she said, “His whole demeanor was very defensive. He was taking it personally. I tried to explain, of course, in a reasonable manner — as reasonable as I could given the fact that I was being interrupted and put on the spot in the middle of class — that this is unfortunately the context of 21st century America.”
No, ma’am this is not the context of 21st century America. This is propagated cultural Marxism, where the oppressed meet the “oppressor” in an ardent attempt to create a classless society. In this case, a society where white men are eliminated. The student in question more than likely overdosed on all the vile hatred for white males being spewed by Ms. Gibney.
What Ms. Gibney didn’t expect was that the students would file a complaint, and that she would be reprimanded by the school’s vice president of academic affairs for creating a “hostile learning environment.” Why would they accuse her of this? For hammering away at her students about “the existence and operations of structural racism,” Salon reported. She tried to browbeat her white male students into buying the lie that they’re racist by virtue of skin color, whether they acknowledge it or not. But they had reached their limit. They revolted and sought some needed revenge.
It is worth noting that this was not the first time that Gibney had been accused of personal attacks against white male students. The Raw Story.com reported on Monday, December 2nd that it happened the first time in 2009. An editor of the school paper took offense to her comments about structural racism. Namely, her singling out white men as racist. What a coincidence.
Ms. Gibney is doing what any progressive would do, targeting white male students as the propagators of structural racism. In a completely unfair attack, she blindsides them with accusations. They respond negatively, as anyone would, who is unfairly accused of being racist solely because of skin color, and being born male. No student should be subjected to such vile propaganda and hatred. Ms. Gibney is practicing her own brand of racism, but she gets a pass because she is a woman and a woman of color.
Where are the women defending white men from these outrageous accusations of structural racism? “White privilege” is implied, but in this instance, the message is clear. The target is white men. Feminist hate is to blame for so much of the white male privilege, structural racist targeting of white men. Charges of “misogyny” forever cloud every feminist thought toward men, as women want to be men. But when it gets down to it, they don’t want to be treated like men. There is a difference.
Accusations of misogyny are often used by women for excusing their dastardly behavior. Calling women out for their wrongs does not make one unnecessarily hostile, as Ms. Gibney implied her male students were when responding to her. They were white, she is black, so naturally they were demonstrating aggression toward her. All they did was express discontent with being labeled “racist.” The accusations were coming from her.
Women must step up to the plate to combat the gutter trash that is white male privilege. Structural racism is not a white male problem. Today, it appears it is a progressive, liberal problem. Men and women of color have even more leeway when propagating these lies. People are all born evil, fully assimilated into sin. The sin nature allows each individual to look at another with disdain, while refusing to look at themselves. Every person is responsible for himself or herself with no excuses.
These three young men did something that many feel too intimidated to do. They revolted and sought revenge on a brutish female professor trying to punish them for being white. Now if more white men would be fearless and follow. Revenge on structural racism is one dish that is best served icy cold.