“We will carry on” means the UK Government continues mass migration but increases spying because of the imported terrorism.

Now that the UK government is proposing action in response to the terror attack, we can see how it is following the standard script of gaining power through its total failure to protect us.

The AFP reports,

The British government said Sunday that its security services must have access to encrypted messaging applications such as WhatsApp, as it revealed that the service was used by the man behind the parliament attack.

Khalid Masood, the 52-year-old Briton who killed four people in a rampage in Westminster on Wednesday before being shot dead, reportedly used the Facebook-owned service moments before the assault.

Home Secretary Amber Rudd told Sky News it was “completely unacceptable” that police and security services had not been able to crack the heavily encrypted service.

“You can’t have a situation where you have terrorists talking to each other — where this terrorist sent a WhatsApp message — and it can’t be accessed,” she said.

Police said Saturday that they still did not know why Masood, a Muslim convert with a violent criminal past, carried out the attack and that he probably acted alone, despite a claim of responsibility by the Islamic State group.

“There should be no place for terrorists to hide,” Rudd said in a separate interview with the BBC.

Rudd magnanimously claims she won’t push for new laws yet. Right now, she’s waiting to see if the company will cooperate voluntarily. She is also pressuring social media companies to censor videos.

Given the government’s and the liberal culture’s constant war against “hate speech” against Islam, it is very unlikely Facebook will ever be able to move quickly against “extremist videos.”

But who is giving terrorists a place to hide? What about the ghettos that have been seeded by mass migration and nourished by other Liberal policies. DailyMail.com columnist Katie Hopkins points out that the Liberals are the ones who have created this situation:

She hates the claim “We will not be cowed by terrorism” because it is obviously false. But on another level the slogan is truthful and all the more horrible. By promoting the idea that they will “carry on,” the UK government is saying they will never change their policies even though they guarantee more attacks.

The UK government will end the privacy of Brits, but they won’t change their immigration rules. They “will not be cowed” no matter how many British citizens are killed.

Here is some more from Katie Hopkins comparing these slogans to the response of ants when they are stepped on.

She’s right. The fact that ants carry on with what they are doing when a line of them are trod underfoot, doesn’t demonstrate their courage; it demonstrates that they are brainless.

So, opposing mass migration that includes many terrorists is considered unthinkable. But defending the right to be able to communicate without state monitoring is also unthinkable. The UK government supports an anti-intellectual culture in which both positions are accused of encouraging terrorism. But continuing to import foreign cultures while increasing government spying is touted as the only civilized position.