Regarding the Fluke-Limbaugh controversy:
a) unmarried women should not be having sex, and should definitely not be proud of it,
b) taxpayers should not be paying for Fluke’s sex life
c) when the government tells a Catholic University they must go against their religion and provide contraception, (and taxpayers fund abortions) that is called the end of Freedom of Religion, the end of The First Amendment, and the beginning of a communist America.
The Liberals changed the dialogue from a Government Control issue to a “Women’s Health” issue. They are so slick.
And, if Obama is so concerned about the “civil public dialogue” and thinks Rush shouldn’t use the word “slut”, why isn’t Obama complaining about Joy Behar’s comment about Sharron Angle, “this b*tch should go to hell,”or Bill Mahr (who contributed $ 1 million to Obama) calling Sarah Palin “a dumb twat,” a “MLF,” and a “c*nt.” ? Hey, Obama why is that politically correct?!
Obama sat there laughing at the White House Correspondents Dinner when Wanda Sykes said, “I hope Rush Limbaugh’s kidneys fail…”
I expect liberals to push “political correctness” – their ultimate goal is to silence Christians, but why are Christians censoring Christians who are speaking the truth in love?
Last month, I was censored by two Christian conservative programs. I was shocked. I thought the church was the last bastion of freedom of thought, especially if my thoughts were lined up with Biblical truth. But no, the church has been brainwashed by our culture and/or is afraid of limiting their audience and losing dollars, so I am angry with the Christians once again.
On my new radio show at the Calvary Chapel owned Reach FM, I was interviewing three Florida high school students who are politically involved in saving America from the atheistic socialism it is sliding into. I was so happy to see young people involved in conservatism, most teenagers are apathetic or are completely controlled by the sludge of MTV, VH1, ABC Family and rap which we all know preaches sexual immorality and God-hating secular humanism.
Teenage John was telling me why he started an after school club called The Political Club. He said the school had a Black Club and a Mexican Club and when he asked if he could start a White Club they said “No, that’s racist.” I reacted, “Racist?! It’s racist to not allow a White Club!” Whites Rights! Whites Rights! (I just thought of that, I didn’t say it on the air. I should have.) John explained that his “Political Club” welcomes both liberals and conservatives and that they have loving debates.
That’s what I believe in, loving debates. It sharpens your convictions to have to defend them. The Bible says we should know what we believe in and why we believe it.
The young man continued that “gay clubs” are allowed at his school. I reacted, “Gay clubs? Jefferson and George Washington’s heads would be exploding if they knew there were gay clubs in public high schools!”
The rest of the hour was happy and informative, Tea Party singer, (black conservative) Lloyd Marcus (http://www.lloydmarcus.com ) joined us.
I thought the radio show went well until I was confronted by my Christian boss in the parking lot who said the show was offensive! What?! He mentioned the “white club” and the “gay club” remarks. What?! I wasn’t rude, insensitive or unloving. And by the way, Leviticus 20:13 is way harsher than me! My black friend Jannique called me and said the show was great! I asked her if it was offensive. She said, “What? What are you talking about?!”
I thought about it for a long while and came up with this…the boss wants me to be “politically correct”!
Who decides what is “politically correct”?
Who decided that it is “politically correct” to examine Palin’s emails and Bush’s grades but all of Obama’s past is sealed, including birth, college records, Passport, and even his participation in a college play? http://www.breitbart.com/
Who decided it’s okay for the President to ignore the New Black Panthers’ voter intimidation but he’s allowed to say “the (white) police acted stupidly” in protecting Professor Gates from a thief?
Who says Muslims can demand footbaths and cross removals , http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/mosqueing-the-public-school/ but prayer in “Jesus name” is not allowed at a school function http://www.persecution.org/2011/06/03/banning-prayer-in-jesuss-name-in-america/ ?
That it’s okay to say G*d D*mn, on television, but not “retard”?
That the word “N*gger” is unacceptable for white people, but okay for black people?
That it is unacceptable to thank Jesus in a valedictorian speech(http://www.theblaze.com/stories/high-school-tells-valedictorian-he-cant-say-how-god-had-changed-his-life/) but it’s legally okay for a Muslim to violently attack someone who dresses up like Mohammed for Halloween? (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2107630/Judge-Mark-Martin-dismisses-case-Muslim-attacked-man-dressed-Zombie-Muhammad.html )
Who decided that we are not allowed to use the adjective Muslim when referring to the Ft. Hood shooter? He was a Muslim. It’s a fact. It’s not a bad word. It’s not unloving. It is speaking the truth in love.
Who decides what I’m allowed to say?
Just because I don’t obey the Bill Maher rule book and elevate blacks or latins over whites and just because I don’t affirm Lady GaGa’s opinion that homosexuality is a genetic flaw and not a “sin” and just because I don’t agree with Obama that blacks and gays should be treated like victims instead of equals and that murdering babies is really “women’s health care” even though the DNA in a baby is completely different than the DNA in it’s mother…how is that offensive?! I have a brain and I use a process called “critical thinking.” I don’t follow sheeple off of cliffs. Arrest me!
Political Correctness is not the same as “speak the truth in love.” Ephesians 4:15
And, when is it considered “loving” to tell sinners that sin is good for them?
The word “sin” is politically incorrect. So, let’s erase it from the Bible?
In reference to “gay clubs,” I am firmly convinced that when a teenager’s young body is being bombarded with hormones for the first time and they have a blank slate, the best way to confuse them, and lead them down the path of immorality and heartache is to give them choices; the homosexual plot lines in Glee, and Modern Family, the Adam Sandler sheep jokes, the L word, Ellen, the Logo channel, etc. It’s child abuse. Our “politically correct” culture is robbing this generation of their innocence. And now, teaching homosexuality in kindergarten?! Child abuse.
If two virgins are saving themselves for marriage and they aren’t bombarded with sexual images from this hedonist culture – they have a greater chance at true romance, the storybook kind, life-long love, and a disease-free, baggage- free, soul mate. Of course they will be sexually confused and tempted if they are shown every sexual deviation invented by sin-prone humans.
What ever happened to “Jesus Christ, is the same, yesterday, today and tomorrow.”
The Episcopals and Presbyterians are now ordaining homosexual pastors. I guess Leviticus 20 and Romans 1 aren’t God’s Word anymore. This watering down of the church is what happened in Germany about the time Hitler was elevated to power, according to Erwin Lutzer’s “When a Nation Forgets God.”
Agustin Blazquez who experienced Castro’s brainwashing firsthand at school in Cuba, says “political correctness is a sophisticated and dangerous form of censorship and oppression, imposed upon the citizenry with the ultimate goal of manipulating, brainwashing and destroying our society….”
Political Correctness began in Germany in 1923 at the Frankfurt School where a group of communists were trying to figure out why communism wasn’t spreading.
Their conclusion: Western Civilization; its belief in the individual.
They believed the only way for communism to advance was to help (force, if necessary) Western Civilization destroy itself. How? Undermine its foundations by chipping away at the rights of the annoying individuals.
How? “Change their speech and thought patterns by spreading the idea that vocalizing your beliefs is disrespectful to others and must be avoided to make up for past inequities and injustices.
And, call it something that sounds positive: “Political Correctness.”
Inspired by the brand new communist technique, Mao, in the 1930s, wrote an article on the “correct” handling of contradictions among the people. “Sensitive training” – sound familiar? – and speech codes were born.” Rest of the article here:
“It’s one thing is to be educated, considerate, polite and have good manners, and another to be forced to self-censor and say things that are totally incorrect in order to comply with the arbitrary dictums of a deceiving and fanatical far-left agenda.
Let’s preserve our freedom and say NO to the scourge of Political Correctness,” …even if it’s to our misled Christian brothers and sisters.
A Caller to the Rush Limbaugh show this week:
…what you’re dealing with and so effectively, Rush, is you’re countering every day, not just Democrats, but you’re countering the spirit of anti-Christ, how the Catholic Church is being forced to pay for health care, for morning-after pills. And you talk about indecent, President Obama’s indecent, infanticide is indecent. Being the abortion president who forces people against their conscience to pay for other people’s abortions is indecent. It’s beyond the pale that people can’t — I’m afraid for America that we’re not seeing this. This election coming up is so crucial. Just stay on guard and be the watchman on the wall, Rush, and you’re fighting the spirit of anti-Christ. This redistribution of wealth, infanticide, government controlling everything, clamoring against Christianity and everybody else has rights and Muslims, but not Christians, all this is the spirit of anti-Christ. You’re doing a great job, and you’re right, you are a gift from God.
RUSH: On loan.
CALLER: On loan.
RUSH: On loan.
CALLER: Thank you.
RUSH: On loan.
CALLER: Thank you.
RUSH: On loan. Christian, thank you very much.
CALLER: You’re very welcome.
Another case: Christian groups under attack at Vanderbilt University